Orsted to pay New Jersey $125m for scrapping US offshore wind farm plans
State regulator sets new record for project cancellation penalties as governor brings forward planned fifth round of procurement
Danish offshore wind developers will pay $125m in penalties to New Jersey for the cancellation last year of its 2.25GW Ocean Wind 1 & 2 projects, state utilities regulator Board of Public Utilities (NJBPU) announced Monday along with an acceleration of its plans for future procurement.
The state and NJBPU “have settled their claims against Orsted arising out of Orsted’s decision to cease development on the Ocean Wind 1 and Ocean Wind 2 projects,” the regulator said in a statement.
“The State and Orsted have agreed to release claims against each other arising out of or related to the Ocean Wind Projects, and the State will receive $125m,” NJBPU added.
The announcement came as the state said it will speed up its plans for a fifth solicitation round, which it now expects to open in Q2 next year instead of Q3 2026, a move it said would "underscore our commitment to realising the industry’s full potential for the benefit of all New Jerseyans".
Record penalty
This is the highest fine for project cancellation seen in the US sector after the bloodbath of 2023 that voided half of all contracted capacity.
Orsted's Ocean Wind 1 was awarded in the state’s first solicitation in 2019 at $116.8/MWh, while Ocean Wind 2 gained its contract in round 2 in 2021 at only $42.3/MWh, reflecting the now discredited view that the industry’s levelised cost of energy (LCOE) was in steady and steep decline.
SAA 2 'suspended'
FERC regulates interstate transmission of power and natural gas, and its rule 1920 is considered a watershed as it requires systems operators to engage in long term planning and cost allocation that incorporates multiple benefits, including advancing clean energy deployments.
The SAA 1 upgrades would only interconnect 6.4GW, and the state had opened the process for a SAA 2 for the remaining capacity on its 11GW by 2040 goal.
NJBPU said a pause allows it to fully evaluate the implications of the new FERC rule to “ensure the best outcome to meet New Jersey’s transmission needs at the least cost to ratepayers.”
(Copyright)