New Jersey opens big new offshore wind round 3 amid whale death furore
Round 3 for 1.2-4GW comes as state and wider US sector faces backlash over strandings, which governor dismisses as politically motivated
US offshore wind pacesetter New Jersey opened up its round 3 solicitation for between 1.2GW and 4GW of capacity, adding to the 3.75GW the state already has under contract towards the mandate of 11GW by 2040.
“Offshore wind constitutes a crucial component of our journey to 100% clean energy by 2035, a benchmark that solidifies our position at the national forefront of climate action,” said governor Phil Murphy.
“In addition to safeguarding our communities from the worsening impacts of climate change, this emerging industry will generate thousands of good-paying jobs and economic opportunity across the state.”
Murphy called such claims “unfounded” and “motivated not by a concern for our environment, but by their own political ideologies”.
The $1bn LCS is the first grid project to leverage regional transmission operator PJM’s federally approved State Agreement Approach (SAA) development process that allows states to incorporate policy goals as an equal factor to market efficiency or reliability when proposing grid upgrades.
New Jersey’s round 3 application window will remain open from 6 March until 23 June, with New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (NJBPU), the agency charged with overseeing the state’s offshore wind programme, expecting to make its final selection by year’s end.
NJBPU requires that all bids include an economic development plan that furthers the state’s aspirations of becoming a regional hub and “strongly encourages use of the New Jersey Wind Port (NJWP) for project marshalling and for locating Tier 1 manufacturing facilities”.
Terms for offshore wind renewable energy credits (OREC) are for 20 years and include both an annual escalator and inflation adjustment mechanisms.
In a nod to offtake contract challenges being seen in Massachusetts and Virginia, New Jersey warns OREC pricing will be on a pay-for-performance basis and that “ratepayers will not be responsible for any costs associated with non-performance” or cost overruns.
(Copyright)